(no subject)
Dec. 21st, 2018 05:23 pmMost of my online friends are rationalist-adjacent, so I suppose that makes me rationalist-adjacent-adjacent. Thus:
Hello everyone, I'm
sophus! I'm from the glowfic corner of the rodent-sphere. If you know me, it's probably from Amentumblr; I'm also Sophus#7079 on Discord and
sophus-b on realblr if you've met me there.
--
The tumblr function that I most miss here on Dreamwidth is the like button; it was nice to have a low spoons way to show my appreciation of someone's post. However, I've anecdotally heard that some people are using comments with only "+1" and/or "<3" as a kludgy equivalent.
I know that executive dysfunction is fairly common amongst my corner of the diaspora, at least, and I think this idea merits discussion: adopting this, or a similar social norm for the community here would be valuable. I like positive feedback in any form, and I know many others here do too, so a solution that makes it easier to give positive feedback would be extremely useful.
Hello everyone, I'm
--
The tumblr function that I most miss here on Dreamwidth is the like button; it was nice to have a low spoons way to show my appreciation of someone's post. However, I've anecdotally heard that some people are using comments with only "+1" and/or "<3" as a kludgy equivalent.
I know that executive dysfunction is fairly common amongst my corner of the diaspora, at least, and I think this idea merits discussion: adopting this, or a similar social norm for the community here would be valuable. I like positive feedback in any form, and I know many others here do too, so a solution that makes it easier to give positive feedback would be extremely useful.
Kludgey appreciation
Date: 2018-12-22 03:00 am (UTC)... Also welcome!! I do this sometimes but hesitate because it's low-information and low-effort, even though I personally like giving and receiving them. I think the "people making a pinned post about the types of comments they welcome" idea is a good idea/norm - I'd do it more (where I know it's welcome) and not (where it isn't), instead of my current (and silly!) method of "commenting '+1', but only sometimes, self-consciously, depending on which way the wind blows".
no subject
Date: 2018-12-22 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-22 04:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-22 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-23 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-23 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-23 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-22 05:42 am (UTC)Combined what king_of_men said, I'd suggest adding "+1" if there are no other comments or very few, so there's some feedback, but refraining if 'several' starts being applicable.
no subject
Date: 2018-12-23 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-22 08:11 am (UTC)I started thinking about how to limit the clutter if you get a lot of like on the post.
First idea, the poster makes a comment to be a "like" thread for their post. But no, as a poster I wouldn't want to do that.
Second idea, later likes all post under the first like to keep it in on thread. Not sure if I like that option or not.
Third idea, when making the first like, you make a like thread (and either in the same comment or one under it, put their like indicator). Something like "Like thread: <3". Then other people can put their likes under the like thread.
I kind of like that third idea for a way to like a post.
no subject
Date: 2018-12-22 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-23 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-23 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-23 09:16 pm (UTC)Then again, reading/replying to individual threads seems like a way around that, sort of. It's just not as smooth.
These sorts of things make me wonder whether there's enough popular demand to justify investigating how difficult implementing likes would be, and what 'next steps' might be after that (like starting a bounty, maybe).
?
Date: 2018-12-23 09:37 pm (UTC)Re: ?
Date: 2018-12-29 12:24 pm (UTC)Re: ?
Date: 2018-12-30 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-12-23 04:16 am (UTC)only kind of meta
Date: 2018-12-25 05:38 pm (UTC)